AI testing · QA · Automation

Regression in hours, not weeks

Automated testing for web applications — functional, visual, accessibility, SEO, responsive, cross-browser. An agent swarm walks every user flow in hours. Detailed report with screenshots, video, and reproducible steps for every finding.

Start an inquiry →

When you need automated testing

Manual testing works while the app stays small. With every new feature the bug surface grows geometrically — a person can't keep up. Automation pays off when:

The app is too complex for manual regression (more than 10 critical flows)
You need confidence before every deploy that nothing broke
You ship via CI/CD and have no gate on pull requests
You have no dedicated QA team — engineers test their own code
After refactoring you must quickly prove behavior is preserved
An auditor wants documented coverage evidence (WCAG, SOC 2, ISO)

What we test — categories

Coverage depends on scope. For most projects we cover the first five in the same run; the rest by agreement.

Functional E2E — registration, login, checkout, critical user flows; what users do every day.
Regression — a set of scenarios that run on every build; checks nothing broke.
Visual — screenshot diff before/after; difference above threshold is a bug.
Accessibility — axe-core + ARIA + contrast + keyboard nav; WCAG 2.1 AA report.
Performance — Lighthouse + Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) on key pages.
SEO — meta, sitemap, robots, structured data, broken links, redirects.
Cross-browser — Chromium + Firefox + WebKit; mobile viewport by agreement.

Tools — Playwright + WebTesterAI MCP

Classic Playwright stack for execution, combined with WebTesterAI MCP for AI orchestration — the agent writes scenarios, runs the scan, classifies findings, and groups them by cause, not by symptom.

Playwright — Chromium, Firefox, WebKit; headless or headed as needed
WebTesterAI MCP — our agent for scenarios, classification, screenshot diffing
AIIOtalk — orchestrator running 25+ agents in parallel
axe-core + Pa11y — accessibility (WCAG 2.1 A / AA / AAA)
Lighthouse + WebPageTest — performance + Core Web Vitals
Custom scripts for business-specific scenarios (multi-step, stateful, async)

Playwright · WebTesterAI MCP · AIIOtalk · axe-core · Lighthouse · TypeScript

What you get — report & reproducibility

The goal isn't a long bug list; the goal is fast fixes. Every finding comes with enough information that a developer fixes it without guessing.

Every bug: screenshot + video + DOM snapshot + CSS selector
Reproduction steps as an executable Playwright script
Classification by cause (race condition, async, missing fallback, WCAG, perf)
Grouping identical issues into one record (10 bugs of the same XPath = 1 issue)
Export to GitHub Issues, Jira, Linear, or Markdown — your tracker
Re-run after fixes — regression check free within 14 days

CI/CD integration

A one-shot audit is useful; the real shift is running tests on every commit. We set up a CI gate that blocks deploy when critical paths fail.

GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Bitbucket Pipelines — set up in 1 day
Headless run on the staging deploy preview, headed nightly for visual
Status badge in the PR with the number of passed/failed scenarios
Browser caching + parallel execution — 25 agents in 5 minutes
Auto-issue in your tracker on a failed scenario with full reproduction steps
Nightly schedule for scenarios outside the PR gate (visual, perf, full WCAG)

Price & timeline

Price depends on scope — number of critical flows, requested categories, CI integration. Indicative timelines for the first scan and setup:

Small web app (up to 10 flows, functional + a11y): 3–5 working days
Standard app (10–30 flows, all categories except perf): 1–2 weeks
Enterprise (30+ flows, multi-tenant, CI gate): 3–4 weeks
Re-test after fixes: free within 14 days of report delivery
CI integration + maintenance: flat monthly fee, scaled to scope
Report: SL or EN, screenshots + video + reproduction; export to your tracker

Playwright · WebTesterAI · AIIOtalk · CI/CD gate · WCAG · Core Web Vitals

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do you replace our QA team?

No. We replace repetitive manual testing — registration, login, checkout, regression that nobody enjoys doing. Your QA tester gets time for new use cases, exploratory testing, and user research, where human judgment is irreplaceable.

How long does setup take?

First audit (static app, no CI) 3–5 days. Full setup with CI gate and all test categories 1–4 weeks, depending on size. After setup, adding new scenarios is a matter of hours, not days.

What happens when the app gets a new feature?

Existing tests run unchanged. For the new feature we write a new scenario (or the agent drafts one from UI changes, you confirm). Maintenance is a flat fee; with 30+ flows it's typically 1 day per month.

Does anyone else see the tests?

No. All scenarios, screenshots, and data stay on your infrastructure (self-hosted runner) or with us under encrypted storage. Everything is destroyed at contract end or on request.

Can we take the tests over later?

Yes, always. All scenarios are plain Playwright TypeScript in a repository you own. No vendor lock-in. With one migration (copy of .github/workflows) they run without us.

What if we already have a QA platform (Cypress, TestCafe, BrowserStack)?

All of it can run in parallel. AI agent orchestration sits on top of existing tooling — we often write scenarios in Playwright but execute them on your BrowserStack grid. Migration of existing tests is possible; writing from scratch is often more sensible for older suites.